Dow Electronic Materials

Copper Pillar Electroplating Tutorial

December 08, 2016

In a previous tutorial, we provided an overview of copper electroplating for advanced packaging applications, including both via filling and copper pillars. The requirements and processing considerations for electroplated copper pillars for flip chip applications are somewhat different than those for via filling, and warrant additional discussion.

Evolution of Bumping
Evolution of bumping: technology generations
Figure 1: Bumping technology generations

Copper pillars are now common in flip chip interconnection, usually with a lead-free SnAg solder cap on top. The transition to copper pillars has been driven by the limitations related to size and pitch (space between features) of traditional controlled collapse chip connection (C4) bumping. As pitch requirements continue to shrink, copper pillars can enable higher-density designs while maintaining sufficient bump height. The next-generation technology will feature pillars as narrow as 10 to 30 µm.

Copper Pillar Plating Process
: Illustration of the tin-silver capped copper pillar plating process
Figure 2: Illustration of the tin-silver capped copper pillar plating process

Copper pillars are electroplated over a Cu seed layer at the base, with photoresist defining the diameter of the pillar. A nickel diffusion barrier between the pillar and the solder cap limits formation of a copper-tin intermetallic layer at the interface or prevents formation of microvoids. Excessive intermetallic growth and microvoids can both negatively affect reliability. When used with copper chemistry that has exceptionally high purity, this nickel barrier may or may not be needed, depending on customer preferences.

Design and Performance
Design Goal RDL Target 20 μm Pillar Target 50 μm Pillar Target 200 μm Pillar Target
%WID Uniformity <5% <5% <5% <10%
%TIR Doming -5% to 5% -5% to 5% -5% to 5% -5% to 5%
Plating current desities 2 to 12 ASD 4.5 to 12 ASD 4.5 to 18 ASD 20 to 40 ASD
Total Doping
(C,N,O,S,CI)
<20 ppm <20 ppm <20 ppm <20 ppm
Solder Compatibility Void-free w/o Ni Barrier Void-free w/o Ni Barrier Void-free w/o Ni Barrier Void-free w/o Ni Barrier
Figure 3: Typical design goals and performance targets for copper pillars

Proper choice of electroplating materials and processes ensures that pillars meet certain design goals, chosen to optimize quality and reliability. Keeping the impurity level in the plating bath as low as possible minimizes the risk of developing voids at the pillar-solder interface. If dopants such as carbon, sulfur, chlorine and other impurities are kept below 20 ppm, it is possible to form a void-free capped pillar even without using a nickel barrier layer.

Effects of Electrochemical Potential
Figure 4: Within-die uniformity

Pillar height needs to be consistent for proper die attach, but electrochemical potential is not uniform across each die on a wafer. It will be higher at the edges and corners, resulting in taller bumps at the edge and therefore insufficient contact at the center of the die, where the pillars are lower. The higher the bump density, the greater the challenge.

Understanding Within-die Uniformity
Understanding within-die uniformity in copper pillar electroplating: how to calculate
Figure 5: Calculating within-die uniformity

Within-die (WID) co-planarity or uniformity, calculated as shown in figure 5, should usually be less than 5%, although the target may be higher for larger pillars. A lack of WID uniformity within these parameters will cause reliability issues.

WID Control through Chemistry
Role of additives in controlling within-die uniformity in copper pillar electroplating
Figure 6: Role of additives in controlling within-die uniformity

Optimized additives in the electroplating bath can help achieve appropriate WID uniformity. Levelers are preferentially attracted to regions of higher current density, where they suppress electroplating rate and create a more uniform array of pillars.

Calculating Dome Shape
TIR calculation and examples of copper pillar shapes
Figure 7: TIR calculation and examples of copper pillar shapes

Achieving a uniform pillar shape that will be optimum for subsequent solder plating and consistent across a die presents an engineering challenge. Most customers will prefer flat pillars, though occasionally a slightly domed shape may be helpful. The best electroplating materials and processes allow engineers to tailor the profile for each application. In any case, total indicated runout (TIR) should be kept within a range of ± 5%.

Balancing Pillar Shape and Voiding
Samples of flat copper pillars and domed, capped copper pillars
Figure 8: Shown are domed tin-silver capped copper pillars with void-free intermetallic compound (left) and flat copper pillars exhibiting extensive voiding between the copper and tin-silver interface(right)

It is not difficult to achieve flat pillars with the use of additives, but unfortunately, this sometimes comes with a poor pillar-solder interface, also commonly known as intermetallic compound (IMC), that contains multiple voids. Many commercially-available plating baths that produce high-quality interfaces often create pillars that are excessively domed.

Successful Integration of Flat Cu Pillars with SnAg Capping
Void-free capped micro and standard copper pillars with and without Ni
Figure 9: Void-free capped micro and standard copper pillars with and without Ni

Plating baths with optimized additives and copper purity can enable the best of both worlds: a flat pillar with a smooth, continuous interface, with or without a nickel barrier.